According to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), March 2012 set temperature records that dominated the eastern two-thirds of the nation and contributed to the warmest March on record for the contiguous United States since 1895. Last month, more than 15,000 temperature records were broken.
It’s easy to glaze over when hearing these alarm bells, but here are a few direct statements from NOAA’s “State of the Climate National Overview March 2012” that might hit home.
William Geer recently wrote an editorial for The Seattle Times titled “Address Climate Change with Science, Not Opinion Polls.” In it, he challenges that elected officials and policymakers should note the findings of biologists whose research shows that species move when their habitat no longer supports them. These species have tough choices: adapt, migrate or die. He argues that we will soon have the same choices, and government officials should act accordingly.
So why does public acceptance on climate change oscillate? Why — with clear and concrete data since 1895 — is there even a debate? We know that politics are not simple, nor swift, but what will it take to, at least, steer public opinion in the direction of science?
Thanks to the likes of Bill McKibben and the folks at 350.org and 16-year-old Alec Loorz (who will be at Mountainfilm in Telluride this year with a new film) and his peers at Kids vs. Global Warming (who are now suing the government for the development of a comprehensive greenhouse gas pollution reduction plan), the word is getting out.
Now it’s just a matter of getting people to actually listen.
We welcome your insights and reactions to our films and content.
Please engage with us by leaving a comment. All comments will be moderated so
as to avoid spam or unsuitable content being published.
View the discussion thread.